Fast Fashion, Fast Waste: Investigating the intersection of human health and environmental injustice.

Keywords

Ultra-Fast Fashion; Socio-Toxicological Risk; Circular Economy Regulation; NotebookLM- Synthesized Mapping.

Abstract

The global textile industry has shifted toward an "ultra-fast" paradigm, placing extreme pressure on planetary boundaries and human health (Burnstine & Ghattas, 2025). As of 2022, EU textile consumption reached 19 kg per person, making the sector the region’s fourth-largest source of environmental pressure (Bayattork et al., 2026). Globally, the industry accounts for 10% of carbon emissions and 20% of industrial water pollution, driven largely by chemical-intensive processing (Rahman, 2025; European Commission, 2023).

Toxicological risks have reached a critical juncture. Recent studies link microplastic contamination in arterial plaque (fatty deposits that can clog blood vessels) to increased stroke and heart attack risks, while per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine- disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in apparel are associated with developmental disorders and carcinogenicity (Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025; Marfella et al., 2024).

In response, European policy is moving toward mandatory circularity. The revised Waste Framework Directive (WFD) mandates Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) by 2028 (ESG News, 2026). Simultaneously, French Law No. 2025-188 establishes strict PFAS thresholds for apparel starting January 2026 (Rovira et al., 2025). Despite these strides, enforcement gaps persist particularly regarding non-EU platforms bypassing safety standards. Strategic priorities include harmonizing “Ecological Cost” labels, implementing Digital Product Passports, and banning “waste colonization” to protect the Global South.

Introduction

The contemporary fashion industry has transitioned from traditional seasonal cycles to a hyper- accelerated “ultra-fast” paradigm driven by real-time data and fragmented supply chains  (Rahman, 2025; Fasan, 2026; French Republic. Légifrance, 2025). Platforms like Shein release 7,200 new models per day and occasionally exceeding 10,000, a volume predicated on low- quality synthetics, poor labor conditions, and high-emission air freight (Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025; ESG News, 2026; European Commission, 2023).

This acceleration has severe ecological consequences. Global fiber production reached 132 million tonnes in 2024, while garment use-duration dropped by 36% (Fasan, 2026; French Republic. Légifrance, 2025; Intertek, 2026). Consequently, the equivalent of one garbage truck of clothing is landfilled or incinerated every second (Maiti, 2025). Within the European Union, textiles now represent the fourth-largest environmental footprint, surpassed only by food, housing, and mobility (European Environment Agency, 2025; Bayattork et al., 2026).

To address this, the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles aims for all products to be durable, recyclable, and toxin-free by 2030 (Berry, 2025; European Commission, 2022). However, achieving this goal remains a significant challenge, as currently less than 1% of used clothing is recycled into new garments (Fasan, 2026; French Republic. Légifrance, 2025; European Environment Agency, 2024).

The relevance of this study lies in the growing disconnect between the low retail cost of garments and their escalating socio-toxicological price. This article aims to expose the externalized impacts of the ultra-fast fashion model, specifically those affecting human biology and global environmental justice, and to critically evaluate the efficacy of emerging European regulatory frameworks in dismantling a business model predicated on systemic disposability.

Environmental Impacts and Resource Depletion

Environmental degradation caused by the fashion industry is multidimensional, involving the depletion of non-renewable resources, severe strain on local and global water supplies, and the release of persistent pollutants. The textile sector is the world’s second-largest water consumer, requiring 215 trillion tonnes annually (EEA, 2022). The production of a single cotton T-shirt consumes approximately 2,700 liters of fresh water, equivalent to 2.5 years of human drinking needs (Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025). Furthermore, dyeing and finishing contribute to 20% of global industrial water pollution (EEA, 2024). In manufacturing hubs like Tiruppur, India, and Faisalabad, Pakistan, untreated effluents have caused irreversible damage to groundwater and created marine dead zones (Rahman, 2025).

The fashion industry accounts for 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, a figure projected to increase by over 50% by 2030 (Materials Market Report, 2024; European Commission, 2023; Berry, 2025; ESG News, 2026). A critical driver is the sector’s reliance on virgin polyester, which is derived from fossil fuels and accounts for 57% of global fiber production (Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025; Materials Market Report, 2024). Polyester production increased to 71 million tonnes in 2023, underscoring a deepening dependency on petroleum-based materials despite circularity pledges made by major fashion brands, retailers, and industry organizations to shift away from virgin fossil-based materials. (Bayattork et al., 2026; Textile Exchange, 2024). The destruction of unsold inventory adds a secondary layer of emissions, as between 4% and 9% of all textiles put on the European market are destroyed without ever being used, generating approximately 5.6 million tonnes of CO 2 -equivalent emissions (European Environment Agency, 2024; Textile Exchange, 2024).

Synthetic textiles are also the fourth largest source of primary microplastics in the oceans, contributing about 8% of European microplastics released into marine environments (Rovira et al., 2025; Textile Exchange, 2024). A single laundry load of polyester clothing can release up to 700,000 microplastic fibers (European Environment Agency, 2024; Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025). These fibers, predominantly polyester, nylon, and acrylic, are particularly hazardous due to their high surface area, which enhances the adsorption of hydrophobic toxins like pesticides (Bayattork et al., 2026). Research estimates that over 14 million tonnes of microplastics have accumulated on the ocean floor, and approximately 35% of all oceanic primary microplastics originate from the laundering of synthetic textiles (European Environment Agency, 2025; Zhu, 2026). These hydrological and atmospheric costs are not merely side effects; they are the structural requirements for maintaining low-cost high-volume consumption in a globalized market.

Human Health and Pathophysiological Impacts

While environmental consequences are widely discussed, the dialogue regarding direct and long- term human health effects has only recently gained scientific momentum. Evidence is mounting that micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are systemic bio-pollutants, with clinical studies detecting them in the brain, heart, stomach, placenta, and testicles (Bayattork et al., 2026; Savchuk, 2025). A 2024 study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that patients with microplastics in their carotid arteries had a risk of heart attack, stroke, and death that was twice as high as those without such contamination (Savchuk, 2025; Bayattork et al., 2026; ESG News, 2026). Textile- derived MNPs are also suspected of neurotoxicity, as fibrous MNPs can translocate across the blood-brain barrier via direct olfactory pathways or systemic circulation (Bayattork et al., 2026). Experimental studies implicate these particles in oxidative stress (a type of internal cell damage), neuroinflammation (swelling of the brain’s protective tissues), and protein aggregation (which is the abnormal clumping of proteins in the brain), are all mechanisms central to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease (Bayattork et al., 2026).

Modern garments also act as vectors for hazardous chemicals like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for water resistance and azo dyes for pigmentation. These forever chemicals  (termed so because they don’t break down in the environment) act as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), altering hormonal signaling and reproductive health (Rovira et al., 2025). Chronic exposure to PFAS and carcinogenic aromatic amines (AAs) is associated with skin, bladder, and lung cancers, as these substances accumulate in the liver and kidneys (Rovira et al., 2025). The detection of these toxins in breastmilk and meconium suggests that infants are “born pre-polluted”, facing heightened risks since their bodies have underdeveloped detox systems required to process and clear out these industrial toxins. (Savchuk, 2025, para.10; SCCS, 2021).

Heavy metals and chemical dyes also impact dermatological and systemic health. These toxins can cause severe brain and kidney damage, with children being particularly vulnerable to lifelong developmental delays (Shetty et al., 2025; Rovira et al., 2025). Additionally, synthetic fabrics often trigger allergic contact dermatitis and promote bacterial proliferation through sweat retention and trans-epidermal water loss (Pinto & Mizrachi, 2025; Rovira et al., 2025). Phthalates (used to make plastics flexible) and azo dyes (intense synthetic colors) derived from AAs further exacerbate these risks, with the latter classified as Group 1 carcinogens (Rovira et al., 2025). By highlighting these pathophysiological risks, it becomes clear that the capitalist focus on cheap clothing has effectively turned the human body into the final sink for industrial pollutants.

Policy Analysis: The European Regulatory Framework

The European Union has moved to address these crises through waste management reform, chemical restriction, and transparency mandates. The 2025 revision of the Waste Framework Directive introduces mandatory Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for textiles, footwear, and accessories, shifting financial and organizational responsibility for the waste stage directly onto producers (European Commission, 2023; ESG News, 2026). Under these new rules, separate collection became mandatory in January 2025, and national EPR schemes must be operational by April 2028 (Lüttin, 2025; ESG News, 2026; Shetty et al., 2025). To incentivize better design, fees are eco-modulated based on product durability, recyclability, and hazardous substance content, a practice France has applied since January 2025 (Lüttin, 2025; ESG News, 2026). This legislation aims to harmonize the single market for used textiles and ensures that producers sort textiles prior to export to prevent illegal dumping in the Global South (Lüttin, 2025).

France has established the most stringent chemical thresholds globally. Starting January 1, 2026, PFAS is prohibited in textiles, with a comprehensive phase-out by 2030 (Analytical, 2026; Rovira et al., 2025). Decree No. 2025-1376 sets measurable limits: 25 ppb for individual PFAS, 250 ppb for the sum of PFAS, and 50 ppm for total fluorine (Analytical, 2026). Operators exceeding the 50 ppm fluorine limit must provide evidence distinguishing PFAS from non- hazardous substances (Analytical, 2026). 

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) targets structural inefficiencies by introducing a binding ban on destroying unsold apparel and footwear (ESG News, 2026). Large companies must comply by July 19, 2026, while medium-sized enterprises have until 2030 (European Commission, 2022; Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety, 2021). Large enterprises must also begin disclosing information about destroyed inventory in the 2026/2027 period to encourage better forecasting (ESG News, 2026). The ESPR also paves the way for the Digital Product Passport (DPP), requiring brands to disclose durability and material data, with compliance deadlines expected around mid-2028 (Houghton, 2023). Complementing this is the EU Green Claims Directive (GCD), which aims to standardize environmental labeling and prohibit vague claims like “eco-friendly” or “natural” (Jaldygarayeva, 2026). The GCD requires that explicit environmental claims be independently verified before publication, with penalties for non-compliance reaching up to 4% of annual turnover (Fritz, 2026).

Policy Deficiencies and Enforcement Gaps

Asian ultra-fast fashion platforms like Shein and Temu have historically bypassed EU safety and tariff regulations via the “de minimis” exemption, which allows duty-free entry for packages under €150. To level the playing field, EU Finance Ministers have moved to eliminate this exemption starting July 1, 2026, imposing a €3 duty per item category (SCCS, 2025; ESG News, 2026). To improve oversight, a centralized digital customs system will launch in 2028 to track the billions of small, previously unmonitored parcels entering the EU. This ensures these direct- to-consumer imports finally meet European safety standards and contribute to environmental waste funds (Shetty et al., 2025).

Furthermore, current EU policy often fails to address the externalization of environmental costs to the Global South. A significant portion of exported used clothing is, in reality, textile waste that is landfilled or incinerated upon arrival in Africa and Asia (Mishra, 2025). While the revised Waste Framework Directive (WFD) introduces the “principles of proximity” to prioritize local sorting, enforcement remains inconsistent in recipient nations that lack the necessary industrial waste infrastructure to process high volumes of hazardous synthetics (DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives, 2008, pp.30-31).

Policy Options and Recommendations

To effectively mitigate the health and environmental risks of the textile sector, the first priority should be the harmonization of toxicological standards. First, the EU should adopt the French PFAS thresholds as the new REACH standard — the overarching European law that governs chemical safety. By moving away from testing for individual substances and adopting the 2  broader “Total Fluorine” screening under REACH, the EU can create a wide-net approach. This ensures that even unknown precursors and polymers, which eventually break down into hazardous forever chemicals, are caught before they reach the consumer, thus limiting the use of PFAS (Analytical, 2026).

Second, by 2027, the EU should implement a unified Ecological Cost label building on the French AGEC Law (ESG News, 2026; Shetty et al., 2025). Implementing this label would bridge the critical gap between a garment’s low retail price and its high biological and environmental cost. By standardizing carbon, water, and toxicological metrics, this system replaces vague marketing claims with independently verified data, effectively dismantling the greenwashing that often obscures industrial impact. Crucially, allowing third-party entities to publish scores for brands that refuse to disclose data creates a powerful incentive for transparency. This ensures that hidden socio-toxicological costs are made visible, transitioning the market toward a model that prioritizes biological integrity over systemic disposability.

Third, the DPP must become mandatory for all garments, including those from non-EU online platforms. The DPP should provide a comprehensive toxicological profile, listing all chemicals used in dyeing and finishing to assist medical professionals in identifying sensitizers at the point of care.

Fourth, the proposed customs fee should be expanded to include a toxicological surveillance surcharge for imports from high-risk regions. Revenue should fund randomized safety testing at EU ports and support waste management infrastructure in manufacturing countries, effectively internalizing the costs of monitoring hazardous imports.

Finally, policy should strictly prioritize textile-to-textile recycling over the use of recycled PET bottles, which should remain in closed-loop bottle systems. EPR fees must be set high enough to ensure virgin polyester is more expensive than recycled textile fibers, incentivizing genuine circularity and reducing microplastic release.

Conclusion

The impacts of fast fashion represent a convergence of environmental degradation and public health risks that can no longer be addressed through voluntary corporate social responsibility. Scientific evidence connecting textile pollutants to cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, and endocrine disruption highlights a crisis that is fundamentally “woven into our clothes” (Mishra, 2025, p.2). The European Union has established a robust legislative trajectory through the Waste Framework Directive and France’s aggressive PFAS restrictions. However, the efficacy of these measures depends on closing customs loopholes and ensuring that circularity does not become a euphemism for the continued export of waste. By integrating toxicological safety into ecodesign and enforcing mandatory transparency through DPPs, the EU can transition toward a model that values biological integrity and environmental resilience. 

References 

AFP. (2025, December 12). EU to impose €3 duty on low-value imports to tackle flood of  items ordered from China. The Journal. https://www.thejournal.ie/eu-to-impose-e3-  duty-on-low-value-imports-6902151-Dec2025/ 

Akepa. (2026, February 16). Environmental & Human Impact of Fast Fashion | 2026 Facts.  The Sustainable Agency. https://thesustainableagency.com/blog/impact-of-fast-  fashion-stats-and-facts/ 

Analytical. (2026, January 7). France 2026: PFAS limits for fashion and cosmetics –  Analytical Group. Analytical Group. https://analytical-group.com/en/news-en/france-  2026-pfas-limits-for-fashion-and-cosmetics 

Bayattork, M., Rahman, M., Hossain, M. I., Zhang, Y., Haque, A. N. M. A., Kim, B., & Naebe, M. (2026). Impact of Textile-Derived Micro- and Nanoplastics on Brain  Health: An Emerging Environmental Risk. Environmental Science & Technology,  60(4), 2863–2895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c10338 

Berry, R. A. (2025, March 31). The (Not So) Hidden Health Effects of Fast Fashion –  NDNR – Naturopathic Doctor News and Review. NDNR – Naturopathic Doctor News  and Review. https://ndnr.com/health-effects-of-fast-fashion/ 

Burnstine, A. P., & Ghattas, R. (2025). Assessing the Sustainable Circular Fashion Supply  Chain as a Model for Achieving Economic Growth in the Global Market.  Sustainability, 17(19), 8558–8558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198558 

Culpepper, J. (2024, March 19). New study links microplastics to serious health harms in  humans | Environmental Working Group. EWG. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2024/03/new-study-links-microplastics-serious-health-harms-humans 

Directorate-General for Environment. (2026, February 9). New EU rules to stop destruction  of unsold clothes and shoes. Environment.  https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-eu-rules-stop-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-2026-02-09_en 

EEB. (2024). Policy recommendations for green and social ambition in EU textiles  policies. https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Civil-society-recommendations-  for-green-and-social-ambition-in-EU-textiles-policies.pdf 

ESG News. (2026, February 11). Sustainability Reporting after the Omnibus: Live Webinar  with Andreas Rasche. ESG News. https://esgnews.com/eu-moves-to-ban-destruction-of-unsold-clothing-under-new-circular-economy-rules/ 

European Commission. (2022). EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles.  European Commission. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/textiles-strategy_en   

European Commission. (2023). Waste Framework Directive. European Commission.  https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-framework-directive_en 

European Environment Agency. (2022, February 9). Microplastics from textiles: towards a  circular economy for textiles in Europe. Europa.eu.  https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/microplastics-from-textiles-  towards-a-circular-economy-for-textiles-in-europe 

European Environment Agency. (2024, September 17). Textiles.  https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/textiles 

European Environment Agency. (2025, March 26). Circularity of the EU Textiles Value  Chain in Numbers. Europa.eu.  https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/circularity-of-the-eu-textiles-  value-chain-in-numbers 

DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE  COUNCIL of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, (2008).  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/2025-10-16 

Fasan, M. (2026). Fast-fashion : un remède en trompe-l’œil au problème de pouvoir  d’achat | Haut-commissariat à la stratégie et au plan. Haut-Commissariat À La  Stratégie et Au Plan; Haut-commissariat à la Stratégie et au Plan.  https://www.strategie-plan.gouv.fr/publications/fast-fashion-un-remede-en-trompe-  loeil-au-probleme-de-pouvoir-dachat 

French Republic. Légifrance, the public service of the dissemination of law. (2025). LOI n°  2025-188 du 27 février 2025 visant à protéger la population des risques liés aux  substances perfluoroalkylées et polyfluoroalkylées (1). Légifrance. Gouv.fr.  https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000051260902 

Fritz. (2026, February 25). Navigating The EU Green Claims Directive In 2026. NextSDS.  https://nextsds.com/blog/green-claims-directive/ 

Gage, D., Hagen, P., Stern, A., & Walsh, A. (2026, January 7). EU Targets Textile Waste  with Waste Framework Directive Amendments. Beveridge & Diamond PC.  https://www.bdlaw.com/publications/eu-targets-textile-waste-with-waste-framework-  directive-amendments/ 

Guerrero, M. J. (2026). New EU €3 Customs Duty: Impact on Pricing and eCommerce  Competition. Minderest.com. https://www.minderest.com/blog/3-euro-tariff-eu- ecommerce-2026 

Hemanth S. (2026, February 5). France Has Banned PFAS: Why This Is the EU’s Real  Turning Point (and What to Do Now). Medium.  https://medium.com/@hemanthajs47/france-has-banned-pfas-why-this-is-the-eus-  real-turning-point-and-what-to-do-now-94852624bf43   

Houghton, L. (2023). France makes environmental labelling a necessity for large brands.  Segura. https://www.segura.co.uk/resources/press/france-makes-environmental-labelling-a-necessity-for-large-brands 

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2020). IARC Monographs Volume 127:  Some Aromatic Amines and Related Compounds Questions & Answers. World Health  Organization of the United Nations. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-  content/uploads/2020/06/QA_Monographs_Volume-127.pdf 

Intertek. (2026, January). France – Update on Prohibition of Clothing Textile Products, and  Footwear Containing PFAS. Intertek.com. https://www.intertek.com/products-retail/insight-bulletins/2026/1512-france-pfas-ban-clothing-footwear/ 

Jaldygarayeva, A. (2026, February 18). The End of Green Illusions: The EU on  Greenwashing. EuropeanRelations.com. https://europeanrelations.com/the-eus-  evolving-framework-on-greenwashing/ 

Kahmann, S., Staber, G., Sinéad Oryszczuk, Helmer, S., Lofchy, M., Gunn, L., Brauchbar,  S., Zingg, O., Gordon, M. G., Peña, A., Martínez, A. B., Wilkosz, A., Heremans, T.,  Szabolcs Szendrő, Jøsendal, L. C., Petrignet, N., Bourdon, A. L., Redl, I., Rogier de  Vrey, & van. (2025, September 11). The Green Claims Directive – a legal update on  developments, evolving enforcement, and overview of local regulations and  judgments in selected jurisdictions. Cms.law; CMS.  https://cms.law/en/int/publication/the-green-claims-directive-a-legal-update-on-  developments-evolving-enforcement-and-overview-of-local-regulations-and-  judgments-in-selected-juri 

Legifrance. Décret n° 2025-1376 du 28 décembre 2025 relatif à la prévention des risques  résultant de l’exposition aux substances perfluoroalkylées et polyfluoroalkylées.  (2025). Legifrance. 

Lüttin, L. (2025a, January 15). [Textile Industry] The French Textile Eco-score: Key  Updates and What Fashion Brands Need to Know. Carbonfact.  https://www.carbonfact.com/blog/policy/french-eco-score 

Lüttin, L. (2025b, January 15). Overview of All Textile Extended Producer Responsibility  (EPR) Laws. Carbonfact. https://www.carbonfact.com/blog/policy/textile-epr-overview 

Maiti, R. (2025, January 20). The Environmental Impact of Fast Fashion, Explained. Earth.  https://earth.org/fast-fashions-detrimental-effect-on-the-environment/ 

Marfella, R., Prattichizzo, F., Sardu, C., Fulgenzi, G., Graciotti, L., Spadoni, T., D’Onofrio,  N., Scisciola, L., La Grotta, R., Frigé, C., Pellegrini, V., Municinò, M., Siniscalchi,  M., Spinetti, F., Vigliotti, G., Vecchione, C., Carrizzo, A., Accarino, G., Squillante,  A., & Spaziano, G. (2024). Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and  Cardiovascular Events. The New England Journal of Medicine, 390(10), 900–910.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2309822   

Textile Exchange. (2024). Materials Market Report.  https://2d73cea0.delivery.rocketcdn.me/app/uploads/2024/09/Materials-Market-  Report-2024.pdf 

Mishra, V. (2025, March 27). Fast Fashion Fuelling Global Waste crisis, UN Chief Warns.  UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/03/1161636 

Mitchell, E. (2025, November 6). Waste Framework Directive: EU Textiles – New Rules  Are Coming. Valpak. https://www.valpak.co.uk/waste-framework-directive-eu-  textiles-new-rules-are-coming/ 

Modexpress B.V. (2026, January 16). Digital Product Passport: How new EU rules will  affect fashion companies. Modexpress. https://www.modexpress.com/expert-  info/digital-product-passport/ 

Pinto, V. C. D., & Mizrachi, M. P. (2025). The Health Impact of Fast Fashion: Exploring  Toxic Chemicals in Clothing and Textiles. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 84.  https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020084 

Rahman, M. (2025). Toxic Threads: Southeast Asia’s Textile Pollution Poses a Growing  Security Threat. New Security Beat. https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2025/08/toxic-threads-southeast-asias-textile-pollution-poses-a-growing-security-threat/ 

Rovira, J., Oliveira, C., Nadal, M., & Domingo, J. L. (2025). Human health risks from  textile chemicals: a critical review of recent evidence (2019–2025). Journal of  Environmental Science and Health Part A, 60(2), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2025.2514406 

Savchuk, K. (2025). What’s the deal with microplastics, the material that “never goes  away”? News Center. https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2025/01/microplastics-in-body-polluted-tiny-plastic-fragments.html 

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. (2021). Opinion on the safety of presence of  BPA in clothing articles. European Commission.  https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-08/sccs_o_240.pdf 

Shetty, B. R., Jagadeesha, P. B., & Salmataj, S. A. (2025). Heavy metal contamination and  its impact on the food chain: exposure, bioaccumulation, and risk assessment. CyTA –  Journal of Food, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2024.2438726 

Tracextech. (2026, February 26). EU Textile Strategy: Digital Product Passport Guide  (2026-2027). Blockchain for Food Safety, Traceability and Supplychain  Transparency. https://tracextech.com/eu-textile-strategy-dpp-compliance/ 

UN-Habitat . (2025). Towards Zero Waste in Fashion and Textiles. UNEP.  https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2025/02/zwd2025_-_marketing_brief_final.pdf 

United Nations. (2025). Trends in natural and man-made fibres trade. United Nations  Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-  document/ditccom2025d2_en.pdf   

UNODC. (2025). Unwaste Trendspotting Alert No. 8. European  Union.https://www.unodc.org/res/environment-climate/asia-  pacific/unwaste_html/Unwaste_Trendspotting_Alert_No.8.pdf 

Zhu, D. M. (2026). France Publishes Updated PFAS Regulation for Consumer Products.  SGSCorp. https://www.sgs.com/en-es/news/2026/01/safeguards-00626-france-publishes-updated-pfas-regulation-for-consumer-products